SOLDIER IN BATTLE-VOLUME TWO

10  MORE REASONS WHY WE AREN'T RICH, a commentary OBAMA,a change to what ? Part 2 by Brother Taalik November 2008 Angelsnupnup7's Visitor's Page Letter to a young misguided Black Muslim by Brother Taalik BARON d' HOLBOCH, a biography Imani  Entertainment Group's KEYSHIA COLE Angelsnupnup7's  December 2008 Visitor's Page Why I've chosen not 2 believe in God, a personal story REALITY'S  TEMPLE ON EARTH as hosted by Brother AdMinister Taalik Ibn'rad STATE OF MISSOURI PRACTICES LEGAL MURDER & ABUSE Yes  VIRGINIA , Allah ( GOD ) doesn't EXIST !!! STATE  OF ILLINOIS TERRORIZES RODNEY YODER SOLDIER  IN BATTLE-VOLUME TWO SOLDIER  IN BATTLE GOES TO COURT SOLDIER  IN BATTLE-VOLUME THREE POET'S CORNER VOLUME THREE ARE  AFRICAN AMERICANS ASHAMED OF BEING BLACK? SOLDIER  IN BATTLE-VOLUME FOUR ANGELSNUPNUP7'S  FAVORITE VISITOR OF THE MONTH I  FLEW OVER THE CUCKOOS NEST PSYCHIATRIC  ABUSE EXPOSED!!!!! I  DON'T WANT NO MILK,a commentary ANGELSNUPNUP7'S  VISITOR'S PAGE-JULY/AUGUST 2007 BLACK PSYCHIATRIST SPEAKS ON WHITE SUPREMACY IS  THE WHITEMAN THE DEVIL? THE  N' WORD GET OVER IT!!! ANGELSNUPNUP7'S  VISITOR'S PAGE-OCTOBER 2007 DO NOT 4 GET THE WHITES WHO HELPED BLACKS MESSAGE  TO THE MISGUIDED BLACKMAN OF AMERICA THE FINAL CALL HEADLINE NEWS HEALTH-NATURAL CURES.COM WOULD BEING AN ATHEIST BE BETTER FOR US? POET'S CORNER VOLUME ONE JUST HOW DISGUSTING IS ORAL/ANAL SEX? IS THIS MASTER WALLACE FARD MUHAMMAD? THE  BIOLOGY OF RELIGION,a commentary ISLAM  JUSTIFIES SLAVERY , a commentary DID  JESUS REALLY EXIST? a commentary DID PROPHET MUHAMMAD REALLY EXIST? a commentary WERE JEWS/HEBREWS HELD AS SLAVES IN EGYPT?, a commentary ANGELSNUPNUP7'S  VISITOR'S PAGE-SEPTEMBER 2007 COULD  THE HOLOCAUST BE A MYTH ? a commentary WHY SHOULD GOD BE BETTER THAN YOU? RESPONSE  2 THE RACIST CAUCASION MALE OFFICIAL RECORDS SHOW THE JEWISH HOLOCAUST AS FRAUD PORK the most dangerous meat of them all !!!! DOES THE U.S. REJOICE IN THE RETURN OF JIM CROW? HONKY should CAUCASIONS get over it ? A commentary OH GOD! IT'S A BLACKMAN WITH A GUN... BLACKS ARE OF A LOWER INTELLIGENCE ? a commentary ANGELSNUPNUP7'S  VISITOR'S PAGE-NOVEMBER 2007 WILL  THE SO CALLED NEGRO JOIN al-QAIDA? SHOULD THE SO CALLED NEGRO or BLACKS RECEIVE REPARATIONS? ANGELSNUPNUP7'S  VISITOR'S PAGE- DECEMBER 2007 WHY  DO CAUCASIONS ALL OF SUDDEN LOVE MALCOM x ? EUROPEAN  JEWS NO BLOODLINE TO ABRAHAM ? MAN TERRORIZED BY BLOODTHIRSTY MISSOURI STATE PSYCHIATRISTS,FREED! Psychiatric Evaluation of Brother Lorne Lei Wray 2007 Can the GOVERNMENT force psychiatric drugs on CITIZENS? PRETTY  RELIGION ( when good folks do nothing ) Brother Wray requests MERCY from the court Brother Wray petitions for release from PARASITIC psychiatrists Brother  Wray SPEAKS to JUDGE David Dowd Brother Wray,plaintiff versus Missouri Dept. of Mental Health,defendant  Angelsnupnup7's VISITOR'S PAGE- January 2008 CLOUD WITH A SILVER LINING - VOLUME ONE HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE that SILENT KILLER Fair Debt Collections Act of 1978 The Taalik & Khalifa SHOW-January 2008 VISITOR'S PAGE We Must STOP the rise of a BLACK MESSIAH (JESUS) Angelsnupnup7's Visitor's Page- The Taalik & Khalifa SHOW Episode 2 Angelsnupnup7's Visitor's Page - February 2008 Basic Knowledge of the Nation of Islam The Joke called Black Entertainment Television, a commentary Angelsnupnup7's Visitor's Page-March 2008 What does the REALITY'S TEMPLE stand for ? CLOUD WITH A SILVER LINING - VOLUME TWO Angelsnupnup7's Visitor's Page -April 2008 IN LOVING MEMORY OF MY FATHER LIONEL CHAVIS Slavery  Reparations - past over due ! a commentary Angelsnupnup's Visitor's Page as of MAY 2008 Slavery  Reparations from WIKIPEDIA Angelsnupnup7's Visitors page for JUNE 2008 The Nation of Islam, a Brutal Legacy ? Nation of Islam involved in the ZEBRA murders ? SOLDIER  IN BATTLE-VOLUME ONE Angelsnupnup7's Visitor's Page as of JULY / AUGUST 2008 Does B.C. mean before CHRIST, a commentary How To Buy a Good USED CAR , a commentary Congratulations to President- Elect BARACK OBAMA OBAMA , a Change to What?..a message by Brother Taalik Did Moses Exist ? a discussion November  2008-Angelsnupnup7's Visitor's Page Part 2 Zoroastrianism, a religion, a Commentary 2009/January  Visitor's Page PROPOSAL for the SOLUTION of the PROBLEMS of so called BLACKS POET'S CORNER VOLUME TWO How  2 Control People The plans for GLOBAL Dictatorship QUACKERY  is Psychiatry, NO DOUBT ! Hip Hop Nation the builders of a new Civilization SARA  SUTEN SET cancels great debate with Dr. WESLEY MUHAMMAD ....and the BLACKWOMAN made MAN This WORLD has made SEX very,very, NASTY Misery loves company in the BLACK Community  Brother Taalik SPEAKS !!! DARK  EUROPEANS calling themselves BLACK PEOPLE The Blackman GOD of the UNIVERSE ....understanding the WHITEMAN'S HISTORY Brother Taalik SPEAKS!!!## 2 GREAT REWARD 4 Black People MICHAEL JACKSON dies at age 50 Brother Taalik Speaks ## 3 MESSAGE  2 SARA SUTEN SETI Michael Jackson his Life & Times a GLOBAL ICON The Moorish American- A Brief History Being Sicilan & What I Think About GOD WHY  I DO NOT SUPPORT GLOBAL AFRICAN SUPREMACY The UnderCover Racist called KKILO34 The TROUBLEMAKER called Sara Suten Seti SUICIDE NOTE of a DOMESTIC TERRORIST The INTERRACIAL & HOMOSEXUAL in Black Liberation Is a RACE WAR Coming ? JEWS & The Black Holocaust



22nd  JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF MISSOURI, ST. LOUIS CITY#10 N. TUCKER BLVD.      ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI  63101-2097 

WRAY                                           AUGUST  05, 2004

               VersusSTATE  OF  MISSOURI           CAUSE # 22MH03000002                                              RE:  CONDITIONAL  RELEASE 

MOTION  TO RECUSE  RICHARD McNELLEY, PUBLIC DEFENDER  & APPOINT DIFFERENT COUNSEL

          NOW COMES THE PETITIONER LORNE LEI WRAY OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED ACTION BEFORE THIS MOST HONORABLE COURT TO REQUEST THAT MR. RICHARD McNELLEY BE HEREBY RECUSED FROM THIS CAUSE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING REASONS : A.     COUNSEL HAS FAILED TO REPRESENT THIS CAUSE TO THE BEST OF HIS ABILITY AS REQUIRED BY LAW.B.      THE ORIGINAL COURSE OF ACTION OF THIS PETITION WAS IN RESPECT OF A PARTIAL CONDITIONAL RELEASE, COUNSEL MADE NO ATTEMPT TO SEEK SUCH SINCE SEPTEMBER 09, 2003.C.     PETITIONER HAS TRIED IN VAIN TO COMMUNICATE WITH COUNSEL BUT LETTERS & PHONE CALLS HAVE GARNERED NO RESPONSE, THUS HE ISN’T INFORMED OF ANY ACTIONSD.     COUNSEL HAS CAUSED PETITIONER TO ACT PRO SE  AS IT HAS BEEN ONE YEAR SINCE HIS ATTEMPT AT RELEASE AND IT WILL BE ONE YEAR AUGUST 29, 2004 WHEN THIS PETITIONER FILED FOR PARTIAL RELEASE.THEREFOR, IT IS CLEAR COUNSEL IS NOT INTERESTED IN THIS AFFAIR ASSIGNED TO HIM. THE PETITIONER HOPES THE COURT UNDERSTANDS PETITIONER’S FRUSTRATION AS NO ONE IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WANTS TO BE INCARCERATED NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH HOSPITALIZATION. IT IS WRONG AS WELL AS A VIOLATION OF LAW TO DENY PETITIONER THE RIGHT TO SEEK RELEASE IN THIS, THIS REQUEST SHOULD BE GRANTED OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE ORDER THIS OFFICER OF THE COURT TO ACT UPON THIS CAUSE IN AN EXPEDIENT MANNER . RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

ST. LOUIS PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION CENTER

5300 ARSENAL STREET                     ST. LOUIS, MO. 63139-1463 LORNE  LEI  WRAY  I.D. # 116635-3                     AUGUST 16 , 2004COTTAGE # 10 TO :  RIGHTS & ETHICS           AFTER RECEIVING  THE ANSWER OF APPEAL IN RELATION TO COMPLAINT # 604-7, THE FACILITY CONTINUES TO AVOID THE ISSUE OF PREJUDICE & FAVORITISM OF ONE CLIENT OVER ANOTHER THIS IS HIDDEN AS INDIVIDUAL TREATMENT ISSUES BUT DOESN’T GIVE ANY EXPLAIN- ATION TO HOW IT IS POSSIBLE IF I AM THE ONE ATTACKED OR THREATENED HOW DO I END UP ON A CLOSED WARD AND PLACED ON WARD RESTRICTION NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO PARTICIPATE IN BLACK HISTORY MONTH ALL THE WHILE THE AGGRESSOR IS NOT TOUCHED IN FACT SEEMINGLY CONGRATULATED IN THAT HE IS BEHAVING IN  SUCH A INAPPROPRIATE MANNER?  COMPLAINT # 704-4  &  704-5  WAS FILED IN THE SECOND WEEK OF JULY BUT IT HAS BEEN NOT ADDRESSED NOT EVEN IN THE WEAK FORM AS EXPRESSED IN COMPLAINT # 604-7.          WHY HASN’T THERE BEEN ANY RESPONSE IN ALMOST A MONTH WHEN ALL COMPLAINTS IN GENERAL ARE ANSWERED WITHIN 7 BUSINESS DAYS. IT IS CLEAR TO ME IT IS DIFFICULT TO ANSWER COMPLAINT WHEN YOU MAY SAY SOMETHING THAT MAY INCRIMINATE YOURSELF AS THERE IS NO DOUBT THE FACILITY IS IN VIOLATION OF MISSOURI LAW OF WHERE THOSE IN VOLVED  IN ABUSE CAN BE CHARGED WITH A CLASS D FELONY. THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT THE WEAK ANSWERS PROVIDED TO ME SUPPORT THOSE PARTICIPATING IN FRAUD AND ABUSE AND I AM A VICTIM AS THERE IS NO JUSTIFICATION FOR ME BEING LOCKED UP FOR SEVEN YEARS WITH NO THERAPUTIC BENEFIT IN FACT ALL KNOW I NEVER HAD AN ILLNESS TO BEGIN WITH. WOULD YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN THE FOLLOWING FACTS ?A.     IN 1999 DR. CHERAZARD OPINION THAT I DID NOT SUFFER MENTAL DEFECT ONLY PERSONALITY DISORDER, THUS NO DRUGS AT THE SAME TIME SINCE 1998 I HAD TO PRETEND TO TAKE DRUGS DUE TO THE THREAT OF LIFELONG INCARCERATION.B.     IN 2002 SENT TO FARMINGTON FOR SO CALLED EVALUATION THE OPINION AGAIN IS THAT NO MENTAL DEFECT WAS OBSERVED NO DRUGS ARE OFFERED, IN FARMINGTON EIGHT MONTHS.C.     IN 2004 DR. ASHOK MALLAYA IS ALSO OF THE OPINION THAT NO ILLNESS IS OBSERVED, NO DRUGS HAVE BEEN CONSUMED FOR SURE SINCE DECEMBER 2001.THEREFOR, THE REAL QUESTION IS WHY IS THIS FACILITY DOING ALL IT’S POWER TO HOLD A PERSON THAT THE EVIDENCE IS CLEAR HAS NO MENTAL DEFECT, ACCORDING  TO IT’S OWN OBSERVATIONS?  WHERE DID THE ILLNESS DISAPPEAR TO? HOW DOES THE FACILITY JUSTIFY MY STAY OF OVER 7 YEARS ?   THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THAT I’VE BEEN ANY TYPE OF THREAT TO SOME VICTIM, WHEN THERE HAS BEEN NO TYPE OF CONTACT, THOSE WITH CHILDISH MINDS IN OPINION BELIEVE I DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO SEEK MY VINDICATION THRU PROPER LEGAL VENUE, SINCE I CAN NOT AFFORD AN ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT BOTH MY CIVIL CASE AND ATTEMPTS AT RELEASE OR VINDICATION LEAST TO SAY CERTAIN ACTIONS  I’VE TAKEN DUE TO PURE INCOMPETENCE ON THE PART OF OFFICERS OF THE COURT. EVEN IN THE ALLEGED CASE ITSELF THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SHOW ANY PHYSICAL THREAT  TOWARDS THIS SAD VICTIM WHO STEALS FROM HIS FRIENDS AS THIS IS THE TRUTH A TRUTH THE FACILITY HAS FORGOTTEN BUT A COURT IN ILLINOIS HAS DETERMINED THIS VICTIM IS A THIEF. I WASN’T SEEN AT ANY TIME NEAR THIS VICTIM ONLY SOME PHONE CALLS OR SOUND LIKE THREATENING CALLS OR WRITINGS NOR HAVE I ASSAULTED ANYONE DURING THIS IN CARCERATION YET I’VE BEEN ATTACKED AND THREATENED.      EVEN ACCORDING TO THE FACILITY’S OWN RECORDS THERE IS NO REPORTS OF NO TYPE OF PSYCHOTIC BEHAVIOR  MY STANDING UP FOR MY INNOCENCE AND MY BELIEF IN THE INCOMPETENT RULES OF THIS FACILITY AND IT’S EMPLOYEES DO NOT MAKE ME IN MENTAL DEFECT SO IN WRITING COULD I HAVE THE OFFICIAL REASON OF WHY OVER SEVEN YEARS OF MY LIFE HAS BEEN STOLEN AS WELL AS WHY THESE COMPLAINTS HAVE NOT BEEN ANSWERED TO IN A TIMELY FASHION?I WISH TO WITHDRAW MY COMPLAINT AGAINST DR. ASHOK MALLAYA I BELIEVE HE HAS BEEN GIVEN A COPY OF SUCH AND HIS ACTIONS TOWARDS ME HAS IMPROVED.  THIS CAUSE IS # 704-4 ,  AGAIN  I WISH TO REMIND THIS FACILITY THAT THIS SO CALLED CLIENT IS NOT A FOOL AND HE WILL FOREVER FIGHT THEM TOOTH AND NAIL AS THIS GRIEVANT IS NOT A MENTAL PATIENT IN NEED OF DRUGS OR DANGEROUS. I DO NOT SPEND MY TIME THINKING ABOUT KILLING PEOPLE I WILL NOT ALLOW YOU TO LABEL ME THIS WAY NOR WILL I ALLOW YOU TO TAKE MY MANHOOD I WILL STAND UP FOR WHAT IS CORRECT. THE FACILITY IS KIND TO IT’S KILLERS, CHILD MOLESTORS, DOPE FIENDS  ETC. THOSE WHO ARE GULITY AND HAVE SERIOUS PROBLEMS, IT IS A SHAME THE FACILITY WANTS ME TO BE SOME PERVERT OR CRIMINAL, YOU WANT ME OUT OF MY MIND AND THIS YOU REALLY WANT BECAUSE YOU ARE ARROGANT AND DO NOT WANT TO ADMIT A MISTAKE, I WILL FIGHT YOU UNTIL YOU WILL ADMIT THIS ERROR OR PAY ME WITH MONETARY COMPENSATION.         IN CONCLUSION, IN MY OPINION YOU DO NOT ANSWER MY GRIEVANCE IN A TIMELY MANNER OR NOT AT ALL BECAUSE YOU DO NOT WANT YOUR ANSWER IN WRITING SO THAT LATER ON IT MAY COME BACK TO HAUNT YOU, THIS IS TOO LATE AS YOU’VE STOLEN OVER SEVEN YEARS OF MY LIFE FOR NO JUST MEDICAL OR CRIMINAL REASON ONLY HOLDING ME USING HARASSMENT , COERSION, THREATS OF LIFE LONG INCARCERATION . THE ONLY SOLUTION IS UNCONDITIONAL RELEASE IT IS THE JUST & HONORABLE THING TO DO.RESPECTFULLY YOURS,MORE PRECIOUS THAN GOLD                                        Another  corny poem by:                               BROTHER  TAALIK  IBN’RADIT’S NOT YOUR FUBU JACKETOR TOMMY JEANS, OR SOME OTHER CLOTH A MERCHANT SOLDIT’S  TO KNOW YOU ARE MY FRIENDTHAT MAKES YOU MORE PRECIOUS THAN A VAULT OF GOLDIT’S NOT A LEXUS TRUCKIF YOU COULD DRIVEIT’S NOT ABOUT A STYLEIT’S THE  FRIENDSHIP  THAT WE SHAREEVEN THOU IT SEEMS WE’VE BEEN ON TRIALHOW HAVE YOU BEEN LATELY ?SOME WORDS I’D LIKE TO SHAREON THE PHONE I REALLY DIDN’T WANT NOTHINGAS YOU ARE SWEET LIKE THE PEACH & LIKE THE PEARI CARE NOT ABOUT DIAMOND RINGSOR THE CLOTHES YOU WEAR ENVOGUEA WHISPER CARRIES THRU OUT THE AIRTHAT SPEAKS YOU ARE WORTH MORE THAN GOLDYOU COULD DRIVE A PINTO, YOU COULD DRIVE  A JEEPHOWEVER, HOW ARE YOU AWAKE WHEN YOU ARE SLEEPOH HAPPY THE DAY WHEN WE AS A PEOPLE ARE SET FREE FROM THESE CHAINS OF MENTAL SLAVERYNOTHING OF A MATERIAL MEANS, IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN YOUR SOULMAY WE SUPPORT ONE ANOTHER ALWAYS , ON EACH OTHER’S SHOULDER WE SEEK CONSOLETO ME YOU’LL ALWAYS BE SPECIALTO ME YOU’LL ALWAYS PLAY THE ROLETHE ROLE OF BEING MY ASSOCIATE & FRIENDTHAT I VALUE MORE THAN GOLD   

A  poem dedicated to the HAPPY BIRTHDAY of my most beautiful of  sisters MISS ETCHIKA  ELLIS    SEPTEMBER 25, 2004

Revised  from  AUGUST 25, 1999©  Omni-Crescent Audio & Visual Enterprises  2004

MISSOURI STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER SYSTEM

1114 MARKET STREET # 602     ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI  63101 

WRAY  versus  STATE  of  MISSOURI ,  CAUSE # 22MH03000002

 TO :  ATTORNEY  RICHARD McNELLEY            SEPTEMBER  01, 2004   THE PSYCHIATRIST ASSIGNED TO ME  A  DR. ASHOK  MALLAYA  JUST INFORMED ME THAT YOU ATTEMPTED TO MAKE CONTACT WITH HIM, HE HAS TRIED TO RETURN YOUR CALLS. THIS MESSAGE I’VE ALSO LEFT ON YOUR ANSWERING SERVICE. DR. MALLAYA WISHES TO MEET WITH BOTH OF US SO THAT HE MAY EXPLAIN HIS ONLY SUPPORT OF A TWO STEP CONDITIONAL RELEASE AND THIS HE WANTS TO MAKE CLEAR, ALSO THAT I WANT CLEAR BETWEEN US IS THAT I WANT OUT OF HERE IMMEDIATELY BUT WILL ACCEPT IF CONFRONTED WITH NO CHOICE OF WHICH SHOULDN’T BE THE ISSUE AS THEY TRULY HAVE NO REASON TO CONTINUE THIS BARBARIC INCARCERATION NOT BASED ON SOME ILLNESS BUT THEIR ANGER TOWARDS ME BECAUSE I’LL NOT SUBMIT TO WHAT IS NOT TRUE. ACCORDING TO MISSOURI LAW THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A TWO STEP CONDITIONAL RELEASE OR PARTIAL, THIS IS SOMETHING MENTAL HEALTH HAS MANUFACTURED AND THE COURTS HAVE ACCEPTED IT.            DR. MALLAYA SAYS HE CAN MEET WITH YOU ANY THURSDAY AFTERNOON AGAIN HIS NUMBER IS 644-8221. DR. MALLAYA IS NOT A FRIEND OF MINE, HE IS SUPPORTING SOME TYPE OF RELEASE DUE TO MY PRESSURE OF QUESTIONS. MENTAL HEALTH AS A WHOLE ARE ARROGANT BUT WILL ALSO SUBMIT WHEN QUESTIONED AS THERE IS NO VALID CRIMINAL OR MEDICAL REASON FOR THIS INCARCERATION. AS MY ATTORNEY I EXPECT THE BEST OF YOU, I AM NOT A CRIMINAL AND I AM SICK OF THESE DEVILS TRYING TO LABEL ME AS THE CRIMINALLY INSANE IN NEED OF DRUGS TO CONTROL ME, I AM NEVER GOING TO ACCEPT THIS UNTRUE LABEL WOULD YOU? THEY LIE TO THE COURT LIKE ALL I DO IS LAY AROUND HERE AND PLAN TO KILL PEOPLE AT THE SAME TIME THEY FREE REAL MURDERERS , CHILD MOLESTORS & WORSE. I WISH TO BE AN ASSET TO MY COMMUNITY AND A STRONG ROLE MODEL FOR THESE YOUNG BLACKMEN WHO ARE THROWING THEIR LIVES AWAY IN ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES. I HAVE ALSO ENCOURAGED CLIENTS TO BEHAVE IN A MANNER IN ACCORD WITH LAW AS WELL AS RESPECT TO THEMSELVES. IF YOU CAN’T FIGHT FOR THE TRUTH I WISH YOU WOULD RECUSE YOURSELF AS I AM NOT GOING TO ALLOW THEM TO CONTINUE TO SPREAD THIS LIE. THIS PLACE WAS DESIGNED FOR THE CRIMINALLY INSANE AND THIS I AM NOT  AND WILL NEVER BE. IT IS AMAZING OF HOW FOLKS ARE SO PITIFUL THAT THE ONLY WAY THEY CAN MAKE A LIVING IS THRU THE EXPLOITATION OF OTHERS, ESPECIALLY THE POOR THE STATE SHOULD BE SHAME. I HOPE YOU CAN HELP AND THANK YOU VERY MUCH.RESPECTFULLY YOURS,
NAME  OF  COURT ______________________________
ADDRESS   _____________________________________CITY, STATE, ZIP  ________________________________                                                                          Page # 1 of  2 NAME  OF  PETITIONER                                              ____________________________ADDRESS  ______________________________________CITY, STATE, ZIP  ______________________________                                         VersusNAME  OF RESPONDENT                                              _________________________ADDRESS  ____________________________________CITY, STATE, ZIP DATE :  _________________    CAUSE # ______________ 

PETITION  FOR  WRIT  OF HABEAS  CORPUS

MOTION TO PROCEED AS A POOR PERSONMOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL IN SUPPORTMOTION  TO HAVE CHARGES  DISMISSEDMOTION  FOR SPEEDY TRIAL   

I ,  (  PRINT NAME OF PETITIONER ) _________________________________

THE PETITIONER IN THE ABOVE ENTITLED ACTION ACTING PRO SE AT THIS TIME NOW COME BEFORE THIS MOST HONORABLE COURT TO REQUEST THAT HE IS IMMEDIATELY RELEASED FROM THE PLACE OF HIS DETEN- TION. HE OFFERS THE FOLLOWING : A.     THE PETITIONER BELIEVES HE IS BEING UNLAWFULLY HELD.B.     THE PETITIONER HAS BEEN DENIED A FAST & SPEEDY TRIAL.C.     THE PETITIONER HAS BEEN DENIED TO FACE HIS ACCUSERS.D.     THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO CONVICT PETITIONER OF ANY OFFENSE.E.      THE PETITIONER REQUESTS THAT ALL CHARGES AGAINST HIM BE DISMISSED AND HE IMMEDIATELY RELEASED.F.      IN THE ALTERNATIVE THE PETITIONER MOTIONS THE COURT THAT THIS CASE BE MADE TO BECOME ACTIVE AND THE PETITIONER BE GIVEN A FAST AND SPEEDY TRIAL.G.     DUE TO SEVERE POVERTY THE PETITIONER IS WITHOUT MEANS TO SECURE PRIVATE COUNSEL OR PAY DOCKETING FEES

PAGE  #  2

 

H.     THE PETITIONER’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE IN VIOLATION IN REFERENCE TO AMENDMENT # 6  THE RIGHT TO A SPEEDY AND PUBLIC TRIAL, CONFRONTED WITH THE WITNESSES AGAINST HIM AS WELL AS OBTAIN EVIDENCE & WITNESSES IN HIS FAVOR. PETITIONER HAS BEEN GIVEN INEFFECTIVE COUNSEL THAT HAS ALLOWED HIS RIGHTS TO BE VIOLATED & CASE TO BECOME STALLED.

I.        AMENDMENT # 14  IS IN VIOLATION AS PETITIONER HAS BEEN DEPRIVED BY THE STATE TO LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY WITHOUT THE FULL DUE PROCESS OF LAW, AS THE PETITIONER HAS BEEN INCAR- CERATED AN UNUSUAL AMOUNT OF TIME AND NO ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO SEEK REMEDY.J.       THE PETITIONER OFFERS THE FOLLOWING HE ALSO BELIEVES THAT MAKES HIS INCACERATION INVALID :                     WHERFOR ,  ( PRINT YOUR NAME )                                                                 _____________________________________PRAYS THIS COURT WILL GRANT THE MOTION OF IMMEDIATE RELEASE OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE CAUSE THIS CASE TO BE IN ACCORD WITH THE SIXTH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,                                                           _______________________________________                                                                    SIGN   YOUR NAME                                                           _____________________________________                                                                     PRINT   YOUR NAMEIN THE 20th  JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FRANKLIN COUNTY300 EAST MAIN STREET # 301             UNION, MISSOURI  63084 

WRAY                                              SEPTEMBER  10, 2004

               VersusSTATE OF MISSOURI                 CAUSE #  20R039702116-01                                                                                                     PAGE # 1 of    4

DEFENDANT’S  STATEMENT TO COURT IN RELATION TO CONDITIONAL OR UNCONDITIONAL RELEASE

MOTION  FOR INTERROGATORY

             THE PETITIONER  LORNE LEI WRAY IN THE ABOVE ENTITLED ACTION NOW COME BEFORE THIS MOST HONORABLE COURT TO REQUEST THAT HE IS GIVEN PERMISSION TO SUBMIT HIS STATEMENT IN RELATION TO THIS CAUSE, FURTHER THE PETITIONER MOTIONS THE COURT TO ORDER THE RESPONDENTS TO BRING ANSWER TO THE QUESTIONS ARISEN IN THIS STATEMENT UNDER OATH : THE PETITIONER DOES NOT BELIEVE IN THE PRACTICE OF PSYCHIATRY AND HE IS NOT ALONE, PSYCHIATRY IS NOT SCIENCE OR EVEN FACTUAL IN NATURE IT IS OPINIONATED AND ACCEPTED BECAUSE WE DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE REASONS WHY WHEN HUMAN BEHAVIOR BECOMES IN DEFECT. SINCE PSYCHIATRY IS BASED ON OPINIONS AND NOT FACT IT SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED IN A COURT OF LAW AS IT IS VERY EASY TO TAKE NORMAL BEHAVIOR & MANIPULATE IT TO BECOME IN DEFECT. THE PETITIONER HAS BEEN PUNISHED FOR HIS NON- ACCEPTANCE OF THIS AS A FACTUAL PRACTICE IN FACT PSYCHIATRY IS FRAUD. AT THIS TIME THE COURT ACCEPTS THIS FRAUD AS FACTS, HOWEVER THE COURT SEEMS TO HAVE LOST IT’S ABILITY TO SEEK JUSTICE IN THE USE OF FACTS NOT OPINIONS, IT IGNORES COMMON SENSE, FACTS & LOGIC WHEN IT COMES TO MENTAL HEALTH. THE COURT HAS BECOME DELUSIONAL IN THAT IT ACCEPTS FRAUD OR OPINIONS AS FACT, AT THE SAME TIME MENTAL HEALTH IS ALLOWED TO PRESENT THESE OPINIONS WITH NO FORM OF EVIDENCE OF A FACTUAL NATURE, IN THIS THE STATE OF MISSOURI IS IN VIOLATION OF THE SUPREME COURT RULING IN CHAMBERS  V.S. THE STATE OF FLORIDA AS THIS CASE IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF WHAT THE STATE HAS DONE TO THE PETITIONER. THE COURT RULED IN 1940 THAT COERCED CONFESSIONS OR PROSECUTIONS ARE GENERALLY INFLICTED UPON THE POOR, THE IGNORANT, THE NUMERICALLY WEAK, THE FRIEND LESS OR POWERLESS. THERE IS NO DOUBT THE PETITIONER IS POOR AND GIVEN INEFFECTIVE COUNSEL FORCED TO SUBMIT TO A PLEA OF SOME FORM OF GUILT TO A CRIME THAT NEVER HAPPENED OF WHERE THE EVIDENCE WAS VERY WEAK & ALLEGED VICTIM IS NOT CREDIBLE.         THE PETITIONER WAS DENIED HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND IGNORANT TO BOTH LAW & MENTAL HEALTH. THE DOCTORS ASSIGNED TO DETERMINE HIS MENTAL STATE HAVE BEEN CAUCASION OR SOME FOREIGN PERSON WHO HAS NO IDEA & OUT OF TOUCH WITH PERSONSPAGE # 2                  WHO ARE OF AFRICAN AMERICAN ORIGIN THUS WHAT IS NORMAL AMONG BLACK PEOPLE THEY FIND IN MENTAL DEFECT. THE PETITIONER IS FRIENDLESS AS HE HAS NO PERSONS IN INFLUENTIAL PLACES TO SPEAK FOR HIM, SO IT IS EASY TO DO TO HIM AS A CORRUPT PERSON WOULD SEEM FIT AND HAVE DONE FOR OVER SEVEN YEARS AND THE STATE OF MISSOURI SHOULD BE SHAME. AGAIN, IF THE COURTS AND MENTAL HEALTH ARE JUSTIFIED IN THE THEFT OF THE PETITIONER’S LIFE OF WHERE HIS INCARCERATION HAS SUPPORTED EMPLOYMENT OF WELL OVER A MILLION DOLLARS AND HE HAS NOT BENEFIT IN NO TYPE OF MANNER, THEN THE COURT AND MENTAL HEALTH SHOULD HAVE NO PROBLEM IN ANSWERING QUESTIONS IN RELATION TO JUSTIFICATION.       MENTAL HEALTH ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN RECORDS MADE THE PETITIONER NON- DANGEROUS SINCE 1999, THE PETITIONER HAVE BEEN PLACED IN POSITIONS HE COULD HAVE EASILY ELOPED AS WELL AS GIVEN THE HIGHEST PRIVILEGES AVAILABLE WITHOUT COURT PER- MISSION, SO IT IS CLEAR ONE WAS NOT WORRIED ABOUT ESCAPE THAT WOULD RESULT IN THE HARM OF SOME VICTIM OR ANYONE ELSE. THE PETITIONER HAS NEVER PSYCHICALLY ATTACKED ANYONE HOWEVER HAS BEEN ASSAULTED EVEN SO ONLY IN SELF DEFENSE USED ENOUGH FORCE TO DEFEND HIMSELF. AGAIN IT IS CLEAR PETITIONER IS NOT DANGEROUS HOWEVER DANGEROUSNESS IS MANUFACTURED WHEN THE PETITIONER EXERCISES HIS RIGHTS TO USE THE COURTS AND IS CALLED HARASSMENT OF SOME VICTIM, WHEN THE PETITIONER SEEKS THE PAYMENT OF MONIES HE DID WIN IN AN ILLINOIS COURT SUCH COURT DETERMINED VICTIM WAS A THIEF, THE VICTIM DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO LIE ON THE PETITIONER THAT PETITIONER STALKED HIM SO PETITIONER REQUESTS TO THE COURT TO MAKE HIM PROVE IT AS THIS IS FALSE CHARGES. SINCE THE PETITIONER IS POOR HE HAS NO CHOICE BUT TO SEEK LEGAL REMEDY PRO SE  AS  A POOR PERSON. A SUMMONS IS NOT HARASSMENT A COURT HAS DETERMINED THAT PETITIONER’S COM- PLAINT HAS MERIT AND IS NOT FRIVOLOUS.        THIS VICTIM HAS MADE NO ATTEMPT TO PAY PETITIONER’S JUDGMENT SINCE 1998, THE PETITIONER HAS THE RIGHT TO COLLECT HIS MONIES, IT IS FOOLISH TO CALL THE COLLECTION OF A DEBT SOME FORM OF HARASSMENT, ALL THIS VICTIM HAS TO DO IS PAY THE MONIES. IT IS FOOLISH THAT THE PETITIONER WOULD WANT TO ACCEPT BEING A CRIMINAL, THE PETITIONER IS NOT A CRIMINAL AND HAS THE RIGHT TO SEEK HIS RELEASE AND VINDICATION. THE COURT SHOULD NOT ALLOW MENTAL HEALTH TO MAKE SOME TYPE OF PROBLEM WHEN A PERSON HAS THE RIGHT TO USE THE COURT FOR LEGAL RESOLVE. AFTER RESOLVE IF THE PETITIONER CONTINUED TO USE THE COURT TO FILE FRIVOLOUS CLAIMS IN ORDER TO CONTACT A SO CALLED VICTIM, THEN SUCH CLAIMS CAN BE MADE. AT THIS TIME IT IS OUTRAGEOUS AND MALICIOUS TO CONTINUE INCARCERATION ONLY DUE TO THE FACT PETITIONER IS ONLY EXERCISING HIS RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW.PAGE # 3                  PETITIONER CONTINUES TO BE GIVEN INEFFECTIVE COUNSEL. THE PETITIONER IS NOT AND HAVE NEVER BEEN DANGEROUS IN FACT IF QUESTIONED THIS VICTIM CAN ONLY TELL THE COURT OF THE PETI- TIONER’S GENEROUS & KIND NATURE. THE PETITIONER HAS THE RIGHT TO BECOME ANGRY WHEN HIS BEST FRIEND STOLE FROM HIM, HOW WOULD YOU FEEL IF A PERSON YOU TRUSTED RIPPED YOU OFF AND THEN LAUGHED IN YOUR FACE. THIS VICTIM USED LAW & MENTAL HEALTH TO GET AWAY WITH A CRIME AND THE STATE OF MISSOURI HAS TOLD HIM IT IS ALLRIGHT TO STEAL. THANK YOU VICTIM FOR HELPING US PUT A STRONG BLACKMAN BEHIND BARS THAT WE KNOW IS NOT A CRIMINAL AND WANTED SOMETHING IN LIFE. WHEN THE PETITIONER WENT TO COURT TO ALLOW INEFFECTIVE COUNSEL TO PLEA INSANITY, PETITIONER WATCHED THE JUDGE GIVE PROBATION OF 1 TO 5 YEARS TO PERSONS HE HAS KNOWN I GUESS SINCE THEY WERE JUVENILES WHEN THEY WAS FACING 10 TO 30 YEARS BUT THEN THEY WERE ALSO CAUCASION LIKE THE JUDGE. HOWEVER, THE SAME JUDGE BASED ON WEAK TESTIMONY FROM MENTAL HEALTH KNOWING I HAVE SERVED THREE YEARS LONGER THAN THE MAXIMUM SENTENCE UPON CONVICTION, KNOWING MENTAL HEALTH HAS DONE NOTHING & NO BENEFIT TO PETITIONER CHOSE TO CONTINUE THIS INCARCERATION.          IT IS CLEAR THE STATE OF MISSOURI IS FULL OF RACISTS THEY DO NOT BLACKMEN TO DISAGREE WITH EXPERT OPINION NOT FACTS, THEY DO NOT LIKE BLACKMEN TO READ, WRITE & UNDERSTAND SUCH. RACISM IS THE REASON FOR SEVEN YEARS OF INCARCERATION AS WELL AS THE FRAUD TO ACCOMPANY SUCH, IF THIS IS NOT TRUE IN PETITIONER’S CONCLUSION SINCE HE HAS NEVER BEEN A DANGER, MENTAL HEALTH SHOULD ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS AS WELL AS THE COURT:A.        MENTAL HEALTH’S OPINIONS ARE ACCEPTED ON FACE VALUE THE COURT NEVER ASKS FOR SOME FORM OF FACTUAL EVIDENCE, WHY IS THIS? A PERSON CAN BELIEVE ANOTHER IS HOMOSEXUAL HOWEVER WHAT CAN THEY SHOW FOR EVIDENCE, MENTAL HEALTH CAN SHOW NO EVIDENCE ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN CHARTING TO SUGGEST THE EXISTENCE OF SOME MENTAL ILLNESS.B.         MENTAL HEALTH THREATENED THE PETITIONER WITH LIFELONG INCARCERATION IF HE DOESN’T CONSUME DRUGS SO HE HAD TO PRETEND TO DO SUCH SINCE 1998, IN 2000 MENTAL HEALTH SUPPORTED HIS RELEASE BUT WITHDREW THIS WHEN THEY FOUND OUT PETITIONER NEVER TOOK THESE DRUGS, WHY ARE THEY UPSET THAT PETITIONER HAS BEEN FUNCTIONING VERY WELL BUT NEVER TOOK DRUGS?C.        IN 1999 THE PETITIONER WAS TAKEN OFF OF DRUGS & GIVEN NO MENTAL DEFECT ONLY PERSONALITY DISORDER.D.        IN 2002 THE PETITIONER WAS SENT TO ANOTHER FACILITY FOR A SO CALLED MENTAL EVALUATION AGAIN NO SIGNS OF AN ILLNESS WAS FOUND, NO DRUGS ADMINISTERED.PAGE # 4E.         IN 2004 THE ASSIGNED PHYSICAN WHO WAS OF THE ORIGINAL DOCTORS REPORTS NO SIGNS OF ILLNESS, PETITIONER IS NOT TAKING DRUGS. PETITIONER SUGGESTS RACISM AS AT ONE TIME OR ANOTHER ALL OF THE DOCTORS OF COLOR HAVE DETERMINED PETITIONER SHOWS NO SIGNS OF ILLNESS, PETITIONER IS NOT TAKING DRUGS ON THE OTHER HAND ALL OF THE CAUCASION DOCTORS WANT THE PETITIONER DELUSIONAL EVEN SCHIZOPHRENIC OF WHICH NEVER WAS SUGGESTED UNTIL THEY FOUND OUT HE WAS NOT TAKING DRUGS AND FILED CIVIL SUITS AGAINST THEM.F.         ACCORDING TO MENTAL HEALTH’S OWN CHARTING THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT MENTAL DEFECT IN RELATION TO ANY ILLNESS DESCRIBED IN DIAGNOSTIC SYMPTOMS MANUAL, AGAIN WE ONLY HAVE OPINION AND IS THAT OPINION JUST OR IS IT RACIST OR PREJUDICE IN NATURE? THERE IS ONLY CONFUSION AS PETITIONER HAS AN ILLNESS THIS MINUTE AND THEN IT DISAPPEARS THE COURT SHOULD FIND THIS EXTREMELY CONFUSING BUT NOT REALLY AS PETITIONER IS NOT ILL, LEAST TO SAY PETITIONER DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR DISABILITY NOR ANY MENTAL HEALTH VOCATIONAL PROGRAMS BUT SICK ENOUGH FOR SEVEN YEARS OF TREATMENT?THERFOR, IT IS CLEAR THESE QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ANSWERED BUT COMMON SENSE & LOGIC SUGGESTS PETITIONER’S INCARCERATION IS OUTRAGEOUS & FOOLISH. MENTAL HEALTH HAS TRIED TO BRAINWASH PETITIONER INTO THE BELIEF OF MENTAL DEFECT WHEN EVIDENCE SUGGESTS THEY ARE IN CONFUSION AND THE CONFUSION COMES FROM KNOWING THEY MANUFACTURED A LIE UPON THE PETITIONER AND THE LIE IS FALLING APART AS YOU CAN NOT MAKE PETITIONER AN INSANE CRIMINAL IN NEED OF DRUGS AND THIS HE IS NOT. THE STATE OF MISSOURI SHOULD NOT TOLERATE THIS TYPE OF PRACTICE AND SHOULD GRANT PETITIONER’S RELEASE AS WELL AS ALL MOTIONS CONCERNING HIS ABUSE & VINDICATION. MENTAL HEALTH DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO FILE FALSE BEHAVIORS IN ORDER TO SUPPORT AN ILLNESS THAT NEVER EXISTED NOR USE COERSION TO INTIMIDATE. THE COURT SHOULD FIND THIS CASE NOT ONLY CONFUSING BUT VERY PERTURB.          THE PETITIONER IS VERY UPSET WITH MENTAL HEALTH CALLING HIM SOME DANGEROUS CRIMINAL AS HE IS NOT AND NEVER WILL BE HOWEVER HE SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO USE THE COURTS, PETITIONER HAS NO INTEREST TO HARM A VICTIM OR ANYONE ELSE FOR THAT MATTER. PETITIONER WISHES TO SEEK HIS PERSONAL GOALS AND HOPE TO INFLUENCE YOUNG BLACKMEN TO AVOID DRUGS, CARJACKING AS WELL AS OTHER FORMS OF SELF DESTRUCTION, EVEN WHILE INCAR-CERATED PETITIONER HAS TRIED TO INFLUENCE BETTER BEHAVIORS TO HELP OTHERS WITH RELEASE FROM MENTAL HEALTH. PETITIONER TRIES TO SUGGEST TO EVERYONE THEIR VALUE AND SELF WORTH. PETITIONER WISHES ALL THE BEST OF LIFE, IT IS TIME TO MOVE ON.RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DIVISION111 SOUTH 10th STREET          ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI  63102 WRAY                                               SEPTEMBER 10, 2004             VersusRABUN  et. Al.                            CAUSE #  4: 03-CV-1572  JCH 

MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO SUBMIT FURTHER EVIDENCE

MOTION FOR UPDATED COPY OF DOCKETSHEET

          NOW COMES PETITIONER LORNE LEI WRAY BEFORE THIS COURT TO REQUEST PERMISSION TO SUBMIT FURTHER EVIDENCE & CURRENT COPY OF DOCKETSHEET : A.   CLIENT GRIEVANCE # 704-5, COMPLAINT IS SELF EXPLAIN-ATORY HOWEVER ACCORDING TO FACILITY POLICY ALL COMPLAINTS ARE SUPPOSE TO BE ADDRESSED WITHIN SEVEN BUSINESS DAYS, COMPLAINT HAS NOT BEEN DEALT WITH TILL THIS DAY, WHY?B.    CLIENT GRIEVANCE # 08-17-04  THE PLAINTIFF ASKS ABOUT THE WHY HIS COMPLAINT HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED IN OVER A MONTH, HE ALSO WANTS CERTAIN QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED. ALL THE PERSONS INVOLVED ARE THE DEFENDANTS MENTIONED IN THIS PETITION OR SUIT.UPON STUDY OF THESE DOCUMENTS THIS COURT WILL FIND THAT THE EVIDENCE CONTINUES TO SUPPORT THE ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD & ABUSE BY THE DEFENDANTS OF WHERE THERE IS NO DOUBT. THE DEFENDANTS DO NOT ANSWER THE PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT BECAUSE THEY DO NOT WANT TO PUT IN WRITING THAT WHICH MAY LATER COME TO HAUNT THEM AS THEY KNOW THEY HAVE PRACTICED WRONG. THE PLAINTIFF PRAYS THE COURT WILL APPOINT COUNSEL AND SEND THIS MATTER IF NECESSARY BEFORE A JURY.RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,                                                        LORNE   LEI  WRAY   IN THE 20th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FRANKLIN COUNTY300 EAST MAIN STREET # 301       UNION, MISSOURI 63084 LORNE  LEI  WRAY                       SEPTEMBER  10, 2004116635-35300 ARSENAL STREET # 10ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI   63139-1463                                                                 VersusJUDGE JEFFEREY  SCHAPERKOTTER                            Page #  1  of  3300 E. MAIN ST. UNION, MO. 63084 LISA PREDDY CRANE4-B SOUTH CHURCH ST.   UNION, MO. 63084 

DAMAGE CLAIM > UNSPECIFIED DAMAGES  CIVIL LAWSUIT

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPRIS

MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL IN SUPPORT

JURY TRIAL DEMAND

          I , LORNE LEI WRAY ACTING PRO SE  THE PLAINTIFF IN THE ABOVE ENTITLED ACTION NOW COME BEFORE THIS MOST HONORABLE COURT TO REQUEST PERMISSION TO PROCEED AS A POOR PERSON, COUNSEL IN SUPPORT & JURY TRIAL OF COMPLAINT SEEKING UNSPECIFIED DAMAGES IN THAT THE DEFENDANTS HAVE VIOLATED PLAINTIFF’S RIGHTS UNDER MISSOURI LAW RESULTING IN CONTINUED INCARCERATION FOR NO JUST OR VALID CRIMINAL OR MEDICAL REASON. THE PLAINTIFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING: JEFFEREY SCHAEPERKOTTER -  DUE TO INEFFECTIVE COUNSEL THE PLAINTIFF DID PLEA INSANITY BEFORE THE DEFENDANT, HOWEVER THOSE MAKING PLEAS BEFORE THE PLAINTIFF WERE FACING 15  TO 30 YEARS. THE DEFENDANT SEEMED TO BE FAMILIAR WITH ALL THESE PERSONS FROM THE PAST & GAVE THEM ALL 1 TO 5 YEARS PROBATION. THEY WERE ALL CAUCASION PERSONS, THE PLAINTIFF WAS THE ONLY PERSON OF COLOR FORCED TO PLEA INSANITY AS WELL AS GIVEN FALSE INFORMATION THAT HE WAS FACING 10 – 13 YEARS WHEN IN FACT HE WAS ONLY FACING 4 YEARS MAXIMUM. THIS WAS 1998, PLAINTIFF SUGGESTS THAT THE DEFENDANT IS A RACIST USING THE BENCH AS A MEANS TO DESTROY BLACKMEN. IN SUPPORT OF THIS ALLEGATION IN 2003 THE DEFENDANT DENIES THE PLAINTIFF UNCONDITIONAL RELEASE BASED ON WEAK MENTAL HEALTH TESTIMONY. FURTHER HE POSTPONED THIS DECISION UNTIL ALL ATTORNEYS SUBMIT LAST ARGUMENTS WITH A DEADLINE OF JULY 17, 2003. ACCORDING TO THE PLAINTIFF’S COPY OF DEFENDANT’S DECISION & DOCKETSHEET, THE CLERK ATTEMPTED TO FILE THIS JUDGMENT ON JULY 15 THE SAME TIME MENTAL HEALTH MADE THEIR FINAL ARGUMENT. THE CLERK’S ORIGINAL STAMP WAS MARKEDPAGE # 2                  OUT AND A NEW ONE OF JULY 28 WAS MADE. THE PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY DID NOT MAKE ARGUMENT UNTIL JULY 17, THIS TELLS US THAT THE DEFENDANT HAD ALREADY MADE A DECISION UPON THE PLAINTIFF AND NEVER READ PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY ARGUMENT A DECISION BASED AND ALMOST WORD FOR WORD SOUNDS JUST LIKE MENTAL HEALTH WROTE IT. THE DEFENDANT’S ACTIONS SHOW A FORM OF MALICIOUSNESS & PREJUDICE AS WELL AS RACISTS. THE DEFENDANT FURTHER STATES THAT PLAINTIFF DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO COLLECT HIS MONIES A COURT AWARDED HIM FROM SOME VICTIM NOR THE RIGHT TO SEEK VINDICATION THRU THE COURTS AS TO CHALLENGE THE FALSE CHARGE OF A VICTIM IS CONSIDERED HARASSMENT. THE DEFENDANT DUE TO HIS WORKING RELATIONSHIP OUTSIDE OF THE COURT WITH MENTAL HEALTH USED HIS POSITION TO FAVOR THEM EVEN THOU THE TESTIMONY THEY PRESENTED WAS VERY WEAK, IT WAS CLEAR THE PLAINTIFF PROVED HIS BURDEN. SO THE DEFENDANT POSTPONED HIS JUDGMENT TO GIVE THE ILLUSION THIS WAS A TOUGH DECISION WHEN ALL HE WANTED TO DO, WAS GET OUT THE COURTROOM AS THE AUDIENCE KNEW PLAINTIFF WON HIS CASE. THIS IS CORRUPTION AND AN ABUSE OF THE BENCH. THE DEFENDANT IS IN VIOLATION OF MISSOURI 630.155 ( 4 ) IN THAT HE CONTINUED INCARCERATION THAT HAS FAILED TO PROVIDE SERVICES WHICH ARE REASONABLE & NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN THE GENERAL HEALTH OF THE PLAINTIFF. THE DEFENDANT IS IN VIOLATION OF MISSOURI 630.167.6 IN THAT HE USES HIS POSITION TO PUNISH THE PLAINTIFF FOR EXERCISING HIS RIGHTS TO CHALLENGE THE FALSE CHARGES AGAINST HIM OR COLLECT THE MONIES DUE HIM AWARDED BY ANOTHER COURT AS WELL AS BEING ABLE TO COMPLAIN AGAINST MENTAL HEALTH OF WHICH THE COURT KNOWS IS A PLACE OF FRAUD A PLACE FOOLISH OPINIONS ARE GIVEN TO JUSTIFY THE LOCK UP OF BLACKMEN BY RACISTS LIKE THE DEFENDANT & MENTAL HEALTH.        THE DEFENDANT IS IN VIOLATION OF MISSOURI 630.180 AS HE CAN NOT BE FORCED TO ACCEPT SOME MANUFACTURED MENTAL ILLNESS AS HIS RELIGION TEACHES PSYCHIATRY IS FRAUD. BEFORE THE PLAINTIFF CAN SUBMIT TO ANY OPINION OF DEFECT THE PLAINTIFF’S RELIGION SUGGESTS THAT A RIGOROUS MEDICAL EXAM FIRST BE GIVEN AS SOMETHING SIMPLE AS MALNUTRITION CAN PRODUCE PSYCHOTIC LIKE SYMPTOMS. THE DEFENDANT ALLOWED MENTAL HEALTH TO VOICE OPINION AND NEVER PRODUCE NO FORM OF EVIDENCE OF A FACTUAL NATURE, THIS IS SHEER INCOMPETENCE ON THE PART OF THE DEFEND- ANT. THE DEFENDANT IS IN VIOLATION OF THE SUPREME COURT RULING IN CHAMBERS v.s. FLORIDA  1940  AS HE KNOWS HIS COURT DID NOT FOLLOW PROPER PROCEDURES & DENIED HIM DUE PROCESS CAUSING A FORCED INSANITY PLEA, MALICIOUS PROSECUTION THIS IS GENERALLY INFLICTED UPON THE POOR, THE IGNORANT, THE NUMERICALLY WEAK, THE FRIENDLESS OR POWERLESS. THE PLAINTIFF IS THESE THINGS, LEAST TO SAY IT IS POSSIBLE THE DEFENDANT IS RACIST.PAGE #  3                    LISA  PREDDY CRANE  -  THE DEFENDANT DID DO A GOOD JOB IN REPRESENTING THE PLAINTIFF HOWEVER DUE TO CIRCUMSTANCES UNKNOWN THE DEFENDANT DECIDED TO BECOME INEFFECTIVE COUNSEL. AFTER THE JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT SCHAEPERKOTTER THE DEFENDANT DID NOT WANT TO APPEAL HIS DECISION EVEN THOU THE EVIDENCE SUGGESTED HIS ACTIONS WERE NOT HONORABLE OR THE FACT THAT COUNSEL DID IN ESSENCE WIN IT’S CASE. THE DEFENDANT DID FILE FOR APPEAL BUT MADE NO ATTEMPT TO NOTIFY PLAINTIFF SO PLAINTIFF FILED HIMSELF AND THE DEFENDANT BECAME ANGRY. THE PLAINTIFF IS NOT ALLOWED TO PROCEED WITH AN APPEAL PRO SE, SO THE DEFEND- ANT CONTINUED THE APPEAL. PLEASE NOTE THE DEFENDANT DID NOT NOTIFY PLAINTIFF OF DEFENDANT SCHAEPERKOTTER’S JUDGMENT OR WHEN APPEAL WAS FILED MADE NO ATTEMPT TO CONTACT PLAINTIFF BU MAIL OR PHONE. THE DEFENDANT NEVER SEEMED UPSET THAT DEFEND-ANT SCHAEPERKOTTER NEVER TOOK HER LAST ARGUMENT UNDER CONSIDERATION EVEN WHEN EVIDENCE SHOWN HIS ACTIONS WERE NOT HONORABLE. THE DEFENDANT CONTINUED TO VIOLATE THE PLAINTIFF’S RIGHTS BY ALLOWING THE APPEAL TO EXPIRE FOR FAILURE TO PERFECT SUCH. THE DEFENDANT REFUSED TO ENTERTAIN THIS APPEAL AS TO TELL THE COURTS OF THE DISHONORABLE ACTIONS OF THE JUDGE. AGAIN, THERE SEEMS TO BE A PREJUDICE AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF AS WELL AS A RACISTS COLORATION. UNDER THE LAW THE PLAINTIFF IS ENTITLED TO THE BEST REPRESENTATION AVAILABLE THE DEFENDANT REFUSED TO GIVE HER BEST.WHEREFOR, SINCE DEFENDANT CRANE REFUSED TO GIVE HER BEST AND DEFENDANT SCHAEPERKOTTER HAS ABUSED HIS POSITION IN SUPPORT OF THE WEAK LIES OF MENTAL HEALTH THIS HAS RESULTED IN UNNECES- SARY HARM RESULTING IN THE PLAINTIFF TO BE NOT LEFT ALONE TO ENGAGE IN THE EVERYDAY ACTIVITIES OF LIFE ( MEYER v.s. NEBRASKA  1923 )   AND THE RUIN OF PLAINTIFF’S REPUTATION  ( WISCONSIN v.s. CONSTANTINEAU  1971 ). THE DESTRUCTION OF PLAINTIFF’S LIFE THAT CAN NEVER BE RECOVERED CAUSING EMOTIONAL DISTRESS. IN THIS THE PLAINTIFF REQUESTS OF THE COURT TO GRANT ALL ENCLOSED MOTIONS AND PRAYS COMPLAINT IS BROUGHT TO TRIAL TO RESOLVE THIS DISPUTE A RIGHT THE PLAINTIFF HAS BEING A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,                                                          ___________________________________________                                                                LORNE   LEI  WRAY  NAME  OF COURT _____________________________________ADDRESS  ___________________________________________CITY, STATE, ZIP  __________________________________ DATE : ________________________   CAUSE # ________________ 

PETITIONER’S AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF :

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPRIS

MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL IN SUPPORT

 I ,  _________________________________________   NOW COME BEFORE THIS MOST HONORABLE COURT TO TESTIFY THAT BECAUSE OF MY POVERTY I AM UNABLE TO PAY FOR THE COSTS OF THIS CASE OR TO GIVE SECURITY THEREFOR, NOR THE FUNDS TO SECURE LEGAL REPRESENTATION IN SUPPORT OF THIS CASE. THE PRIMARY REASON OF THIS EXTREME POVERTY IS DUE TO THE PETITIONER BEING HELD AS AN INMATE FOR MORE THAN ONE YEAR. PLAINTIFF :____________________  versus   DEFENDANT :_________________ MY ASSETS ARE  AS FOLLOWS :   MY MONTHLY INCOME  IS :   MY MONTHLY EXPENSES ARE :                THE PETITIONER TESTIFIES UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY IN ACCORD WITH LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES THAT THE ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE AND BECAUSE OF EXTREME POVERTY THE PETITIONER REQUESTS THE COURT WILL GIVE LEAVE TO PROCEED AS A POOR PERSON  AND APPOINT COUNSEL IN SUPPORT. THE PETITIONER PRAYS THAT BOTH OF THESE MOTIONS WILL BE GRANTED.RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,                                                            ______________________________________                                                                       SIGN  YOUR NAME                                                          _______________________________________                                                                        PRINT  YOUR NAMEST. LOUIS PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION CENTER5300 ARSENAL STREET           ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63139-1463 LORNE  LEI  WRAY   116635-3                      SEPTEMBER  10 , 2004COTTAGE # 10                                                  PAGE  # 1  of   2 

PERMISSION TO FILE FORMAL COMPLAINT

RE :  CLIENT WORK PROGRAM

          I , THE GRIEVANT  LORNE WRAY WOULD LIKE TO BRING FORTH COMPLAINT AGAINST THE CLIENT WORK PROGRAM SUPERVISORS TO THIS RIGHTS & ETHICS COMMITTEE. ON SEPTEMBER  09, 2004  I WENT TO MY ASSIGNED SOCIAL WORKER TO HELP ME INQUIRE ABOUT A JOB THAT MAY BE OPENING IN THE FUTURE DUE TO AN UNFORTUNATE INCIDENT. MY SOCIAL WORKER DID APPROACH THOSE OF AUTHORITY IN THIS CLIENT WORK PROGRAM, IN SHORT TERMS THEY TOLD HIM THEY DID NOT LIKE MY ATTITUDE AND FOR THIS THEY WITHOUT OUR KNOWLEDGE HAD TAKEN MY NAME OF A WAITING LIST WHEN WE HAD INQUIRED A FEW MONTHS BEFORE. MY SOCIAL WORKER SPOKE AS IF THEY WERE SAYING I HAD USED PROFANE WORDS AGAINST THEM AS HE WAS PRESENT UPON OUR FIRST MEETING AND KNOWS I DID NOT MATTER OF FACT AS LONG AS I’VE BEEN IN THIS FACILITY I HAVE NEVER USED PROFANE WORDS, FOR ME THE USE OF SUCH SHOWS OUR LEVEL OF THOUGHT AND INTELLI- GENCE MUST NOT BE VERY HIGH.         MY COMPLAINT IS IT MAKES ME VERY SICK WHEN YOU STAND UP AS A HUMAN BEING FOR YOUR RIGHTS, MY SO CALLED ATTITUDE COMES FROM THESE WITH ALL DUE RESPECT CRAZY RACIST WHITE PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE I AM THEIR PUPPET OR SLAVE, I AM SUPPOSE TO ACCEPT ALL THAT THEY SAY OR DO WITH A SMILE. I AM NOT AND WILL NEVER BE YOUR SLAVE. MY ATTITUDE COMES FROM THIS WOMAN IN C.W.P. TALKING TO ME LIKE I AM HER CHILD OR SOME BUFFOON. I HAVE OVER SEVEN YEARS EXPERIENCE IN THIS FACILITY AND I AM NOT GOING TO WORK FOR $2.00 /HR.  I AM NOT GOING TO START FROM SOME SO CALLED BOTTOM AS I’VE BEEN THERE AND THESE RACISTS MANUFACTURED LIES AND EXCUSES AGAINST ME TO TERMINATE ME, EVEN SENDING ME TO ANOTHER FACILITY. THESE RACISTS ALWAYS WANT TO BLAME CLIENTS FOR THEIR ATTITUDES, IF THIS WOMAN HAD RESPECT ME I WOULD HAVE RESPECTED HER. I’VE BEEN TALKING LOUD HERE FOR SEVEN YEARS AND EVEN THOU I HATED THESE CLIENT JOBS, I PERFORMED SATISFACTORY.        WHEN I ROLLED SHOE STRINGS I HAD AN ATTITUDE, WHEN I PUT BOXES TOGETHER I HAD AN ATTITUDE, WHEN I RAN THE MAIL I HAD AN ATTITUDE BUT I LIKED THE MAILROOM BECAUSE I DID NOT STAY IN ONE SPOT AND THE MAJORITY OF THE TIME I WAS UNSUPERVISED, THERE WAS NO COMPLAINTS. FOR SEVEN YEARS AND TILL THE DAY I DIE I WILL HAVE ATTITUDE BECAUSE I AM GROWN AND YOU WILL RESPECT ME LIKE I RESPECT YOU. THESE PEOPLE IN C.W.P. ARE THE ONES WITH ATTITUDE.PAGE # 2                   RACISTS ATTITUDES, C.W.P. AND ALL THESE CAUCASION PEOPLE IN AUTHORITY ARE PREJUDICE AGAINST ME BECAUSE THEY CAN’T SCARE ME, THEY HAVE BECOME PARANOID & DELUSIONAL WITH A FEAR THEY CREATED DUE TO THE EVIL THEY’VE DONE TO ME. THEY DO NOT FEAR FOR SOME VICTIM THAT FEAR I MAY SEEK TO PUNISH THEM FOR STEALING OVER SEVEN YEARS OF MY LIFE, THIS IS DELUSIONAL AS I’VE NEVER GIVEN THEM NO REASON TO THINK SUCH, HOWEVER I DO INTEND TO USE THE COURTS FOR CRIMINAL LIABILITY & MONETARY COMPENSATION, THIS IS LAWFUL ACTIVITY. I AM NOT A CRIMINAL THE COURTS IS THE PROPER REMEDY NOTHING ELSE, I AM AN ENTERTAINER, AN UNCLE, A BROTHER, A SON, A SOLDIER FOR MY PEOPLE WHO STILL ARE MISTREATED & DISCRIMINATED AGAINST AFTER 400 YEARS OF SLAVERY. THIS FACILITY AND PRISONS ARE DESIGNED TO CONTROL AND MANAGE BLACKMEN, KEEPING THESE MEN FROM TAKING CARE OF THEIR FAMILIES & COMMUNITIES. I ASKED TO BE SENT TO SCHOOL OR DO SOMETHING TO IMPROVE MY JOB SKILLS AND NOTHING WAS DONE, ALL THE RACISTS WANTED TO DO WAS MAKE ME A DOPE FIEND AND FORCE ME TO SAY I AM CRAZY, MAKE ME DEPENDENT UPON THEM.       SO IN CONCLUSION, MY ATTITUDE COMES FROM BEING LOCKED UP UNJUSTLY FOR SEVEN YEARS AND IT IS A JOKE TO WANT ME TO WORK A JOB THAT HAS NO THERAPUTIC VALUE AT ALL FOR $ .50/HR. HOW IS THE WORK THERAPUTIC ?  I HAVE DRIVEN MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR LOADS FROM EAST COAST TO WEST COAST, NORTH TO CANADA, SOUTH TO MEXICO. I HAVE BEEN MANAGER TO ASSISTANT MANAGER IN FAST FOOD RESTURANTS & DOLLAR STORES SUPERVISING FROM 5 TO 25 PEOPLE. I HAVE BEEN SECURITY FOR MANY OF MY BLACK LEADERS FROM JESSE JACKSON, FARRAKHAN & AL SHARPTON WHEN I WAS YOUNGER. I HAVE NEVER HAD A PROBLEM ON A JOB AS FAR AS JOB PERFORMANCE AND EVEN BEGAN MY OWN DELIVERY SERVICE OF WHERE I PERSONALLY DID THE DRIVING AND SOLICITATED BUSINESS, WHAT CAN THE CLIENT WORK PROGRAM TEACH ME? I HAVE OVER 12 YEARS FOOD SEVICE EXPERIENCE BUT THE ONLY THING C.W.P. WILL ALLOW ME TO DO IS WASH DISHES, SWEEP FLOORS, WHEN I CAN MANAGE THE KITCHEN BETTER THAN YOUR STAFF, WHAT CAN C.W.P. TEACH ME?       THE ATTITUDE COMES FROM PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE I SHOULD EXCEPT SCRAPS FROM THE TABLE, I DON’T SEE ANY OF THEM CLEANING TOILETS AND ROLLING SHOE STRINGS BUT IT’S GOOD ENOUGH FOR ME BECAUSE THE RACISTS VIEW ME AS A SLAVE OR OTHER IDIOT, THEY BELIEVE THEY ARE BETTER THAN ME, SO SMART HOW DARE I CHALLENGE OR RAISE MY VOICE TO THE ALLMIGHTY. WE WILL GET ALONG MUCH BETTER AS I DID IN FARMINGTON WHEN THEY RESPECT ME AS A HUMAN BEING NOT SOME ANIMAL THEY CAN USE FOR EMPLOYMENT. THIS IS NOT ABOUT ATTITUDE IT’S ABOUT RESPECT , I CAN NOT HELP SOMETIMES HOW I FEEL BECAUSE THIS FACILITY KNOWS IT IS WRONG IN WHAT IT HAS DONE TO ME. I DON’T MIND WORKING BUT I WILL NOT BE YOUR SLAVE OR BE USED. O’ FRIEND OF MINE                                       Another  corny poem by:                                              BROTHER LORNE LEI WRAY  0’ FRIEND   O’ FRIEND, FRIEND OF MINEAS THE EARTH THAT REVOLVES AROUND THE SUNYOU ARE PART OF MY UNIVERSEALWAYS A SHOULDER TO CRY ON WHEN I AM IN PAINA LIGHT OF SUNSHINE EVEN  IN RAINTO MAKE ME STRONG WHEN I AM WEAKSHOULD I FALL, HELP ME TO GET BACK ON MY FEETTHANK YOU FOR YOUR UNDERSTANDINGTHANK YOU FOR YOUR TRUSTTHANK YOU FOR  $ 1. 50  IN FARESO I CAN RIDE THE BUS  ( SMILE )HOW LUCKY FOR ME TO HAVE ONE LIKE YOUI CAN CALL A FRIEND , NOT JUST AN ASSOCIATEMY HEART FILLS WITH JOY JUST TO SEE YOUR FACEIT IS A HONOR TO BE IN YOUR PRESENCEAGAIN, THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT & PRAYERFOR SURELY YOU ARE THE BEST OF THE BESTMAY THE CREATOR GRANT YOU MORE OF THIS LIFETOGETHER, WE CAN WALK ALONG THIS LINEFOR SURELY IT IS A BLESSINGTO CALL YOU A FRIEND OF MINE   INSPIRED & DEDICATED TO THE HAPPY BIRTHDAY OF SISTER SPARKLE HANEY THOMAS ( SMILE ) on this wonderful day of SEPTEMBER 24, 2004 Omni-Crescent Audio & Visual Enterprises © 2004      LAYEALANA, BLESSED DAY OF LOVE                                                          As told by:                                            BROTHER LORNE LEI WRAY WHO KNOWS OF WHERE THE HEART MAY FIND LOVEIT MAY BE FOUND WITHIN PRISON WALLSABOUND IN CLOTH  BACK  TO SOME FLOOROR IN RESTRAINTS ( SMILE ) & A SHOT OF HALDOLOR COULD IT BE LIKE THAT OF A PRINCEIN HAND WITH ROSES UPON THE OPENING OF YOUR DOORNO WALL CAN SEPARATE THAT SPECIAL TOUCH THAT MAY KEEP YOU APARTSUCH WALL WILL FAIL IN THIS ATTEMPT FOR THE LOVE BOTH OF YOU HAVE CAN NOT BE DIVIDEDTHE AFFECTION OF YOUR HEARTSO TO KNOW THIS AND TO KNOW LOVE HAS BEEN FOUND AND THE ANSWER FOR WHAT YOU PRAYED FORLET IT BE SAID THAT THE CREATOR IS PLEASED WITH THIS UNION DEDICATED TO LOVE, MAY THE SUN SHINE SO WARM AND BRIGHT, REJOICE IN THE RELEASING OF THE DOVES THE THROWING OF THE RICETHE UNIVERSE IS HAPPY AS THE STARS SHINE EVER BRIGHTER, SO MUCH JOY THRU OUT ETERNAL SPACETHE SMILE THAT CONSUMES THE GROOM AS HE UNVEILS HIS BRIDE’S BEAUTIFUL FACESO FROM THIS WRITER I WISH YOU PEACE & LAYEALANA, OUT SIDE YOUR WINDOW THE BIRDS SERENADE YOU IN SONGMAY THE PASSION OF A TRUE LOVE KEEP TWO SOULS FOREVER LONGEXCUSE ME AS I COMPOSE MYSELF AS IF I’VE SOMEHOW FORGOTTEN MY NAMEBUT THESE FEW WORDS I DID JOT DOWN FOR THE WEDDING OF BRENDA & JAMES   ( SMILE ) A poem dedicated to a successful marriage of SISTER BRENDA RICHARDSON & BROTHER JAMES CRUMB on this wonderful day of SEPTEMBER 18, 2004 REVISED APRIL 03, 2001Omni-Crescent Audio & Visual Enterprises © 2004IN THE 20th  JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTYP.O. BOX 8445      BELLEVILLE, ILLINOIS, 62222-8445 LORNE LEI WRAY                     SEPTEMBER 25, 2004116635-35300 ARSENAL STREET # 10ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI  63139-1463RE : CAUSE #  97SC-4135 ( SMALL CLAIMS ) REQUEST  TO CLERK OF COURT ( 1st  NOTICE )          I , LORNE LEI WRAY THE PLAINTIFF IN RELATION TO CAUSE # 97SC-4135  WRAY v. ROSS FILED IN THIS COURT AND JUDGMENT DETERMINED ON MARCH 12, 1998 WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST OF THIS COURT A COPY OF OR THE INFORMATION OF HOW TO SECURE A COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN THIS CASE IN- CLUDING THE AMOUNT OF AWARD THE PLAINTIFF DID WIN AS DETERMINED BY THIS COURT. ALSO IF IT IS POSSIBLE A COPY OF THE DOCKETSHEET AS WELL AS ANY INFO RELATING TO AN ACTION OF SOME APPEAL THAT THE PLAINTIFF HAS NOT BEEN MADE AWARE OF. THE PLAINTIFF IS GRATEFUL IN ANY HELP YOU CAN GIVE IN THIS MOST VERY IMPORTANT OF MATTERS.RESPECTFULLY YOURS,                                                             LORNE  LEI  WRAY             ST. LOUIS PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION CENTER5300 ARSENAL STREET      ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63139-1463 LORNE  LEI WRAY # 116635-3                 SEPTEMBER 25, 2004COTTAGE # 10 

PERMISSION TO FILE FORMAL COMPLAINT

RE : GRIEVANCE # 704-5 & 904-2

         THE GRIEVANT LORNE LEI WRAY NOW COMES BEFORE THIS RIGHTS & ETHICS COMMITTEE TO STATE THAT IT HAS BEEN FAR LONGER THAN SEVEN BUSINESS DAYS & THERE HAS BEEN NO ATTEMPT AT RESPONSE IN RELATION TO THE ABOVE PRIOR COMPLAINTS. IN REFERENCE TO 704-5 THE SUBJECT BEING THE REASONS IN WRITING BEHIND THE DENIAL OF MY TRIAL PASSES I DO NOT EXPECT AN ANSWER AS THERE IS NO TRUE REASON FOR SUCH DENIAL, EXCEPT FOR PREJUDICE & RACISTS REASONS. THEY WILL NOT ANSWER IN WRITING DUE TO SUCH COULD BE USED AGAINST THEM IN A COURT OF LAW, BUT THEY ARE FOOLISH BECAUSE THIS ACTION DONE AS HATRED TOWARDS ME DUE TO MY REFUSAL TO EXCEPT THEM TRYING TO MAKE ME A MONSTER IN NEED OF DRUGS OF WHICH I AM NOT OR EVEN CLOSE & WILL NEVER EXCEPT. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO ADD TO 904-2 IN RELATION TO C.W.P.’S ACTIONS IN REGARD TO ME, AS YOU KNOW THEY TOOK ME OF OFF THE WAITING LIST, THEY TELL ME I MUST DO A SIX WEEK EVALUATION BEFORE THE JOB I AM SEEKING CAN BE GIVEN TO ME AS WELL AS WAIT FOR THE JOB TO BE POSTED ON THE BOARD. ISN’T IT INTERESTING THAT THE JOB WASN’T PLACED ON THE BOARD BUT GIVEN TO ANOTHER SO CALLED CLIENT THAT DID NOT GO THRU A SIX WEEK EVALUATION IN PHASE # 1, AT THE SAME TIME A PERSON WAS BROUGHT HERE STRAIGHT FROM A JAIL CELL NEVER WORKED PHASE # 1 PLACED IN PHASE # 2 & BOTH ARE MAKING MORE OR AT THE MINIMUM WAGE.  SOMETHING IS EXTREMELY WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE AND RACISM AS WELL AS PERSONAL HATRED TOWARDS ME IS AT THE CORE, BECAUSE I WILL NOT ALLOW THESE PERSONS TALK TO ME LIKE I AM THEIR CHILD OR SOME ANIMAL TO BE USED.          IN CONCLUSION, COMMON SENSE TELLS US THIS IS INCORRECT AND THIS RIGHTS & ETHICS SHOULD STAND WITH ME WHEN I AM RIGHT AND I AM RIGHT & CORRECT. NONE OF YOU WOULD WORK FAR BELOW YOUR FUNCTIONING ABILITY AS WELL AS FAR BELOW THE MINIMUM WAGE, WHY DO THEY BELIEVE I SHOULD SO?  THEY FEEL I AM A TRAPPED ANIMAL WAITING FOR SLAUGHTER UNLESS I SUBMIT TO THIS MADNESS CALLED REHABILITATION OF WHERE OVER 20 PERSONS ON A WARD STILL CRAVE FOR ILLEGAL DRUGS BUT YET UNDER THIS FACILITY’S CARE FOR COUNTLESS YEARS. I AM NOT MENTALLY ILL, DOPE ADDICT OR SOME CRIMINAL & I DEMAND RESPECT WHEN THESE RACISTS IDIOTS REALIZE THIS, WE’LL HAVE NO FURTHER PROBLEMS.RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,ST. LOUIS PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION CENTER5300 ARSENAL STREET            ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63139-1463 HARVEY  G. PERKINS                       SEPTEMBER  25, 2004COTTAGE # 8 

PERMISSION TO FILE FORMAL COMPLAINT

RE: CLIENT’S SUSPENSION FROM CLIENT WORK PROGRAM

         I ,  LORNE LEI WRAY IN BEHALF OF HARVEY G. PERKINS REQUEST PERMISSION TO FILE GRIEVANCE BEFORE THIS RIGHTS & ETHICS COM- MITTEE. ON SEPTEMBER 22, 2004 MR. PERKINS WAS WRITTEN UP & GIVEN A 5 DAY SUSPENSION FROM THE C.W. PROGRAM. HE BELIEVES THIS WAS UNFAIR DUE TO THE FOLLOWING :MR. PERKINS IS EXPERIENCING A TERRIBLE FAMILY & PERSONAL TRAGEDY SO INTENSE THAT SUCH  WAS A PART OF THE DAILY TELEVISION NEWS ON ALL LOCAL STATIONS, A HOMOCIDE SUICIDEMR. PERKINS MUST NOW EXPECT VISITORS IN RELATION TO THIS TRAGIC EVENT, FUNERAL ARRANGEMENTS, FAMILY COMFORT  ETC. SO FAMILY DID COME TO THIS FACILITY DUE TO THIS OUT OF THE ORDINARY SCHEME OF VISTOR’S HOURS OF WHICH LAPSED OVER TIME HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN ON HIS JOB. MR. PERKINS DID TALK TO HIS SUPERVISOR TO GET A WRITTEN EXCUSE FOR ABSENCE FROM HIS STAFF OR REGISTERED NURSE. HE DID COMMUNICATE TO THE NURSE THAT HE DID NEED A WRITTEN EXCUSE AND SHE SAID SHE WOULD TAKE CARE OF IT, ALL THE  WHILE SHE WAS PLAYING CARDS IN THE SOCIAL REC. ROOM. IS THIS PART OF HER JOB AS APPARENTLY C.W.P. NEVER RECEIVED A WRITTEN EXCUSE AND DECIDED EVEN THOU THEY KNOW OF MR. PERKINS GREAT LOSS IS INDEED VALID THESE PERSONS STILL DECIDED TO SUSPEND HIM FOR FIVE DAYS. IT IS SO INCREDIBLE THIS TRAGEDY THAT HAS FALLEN UPON MR. PERKINS THAT HIS YOUNG RELATIVES ARE SEEKING PROFESSIONAL COUNSELING ALL THE WHILE HE WANTS TO CONTINUE WORK AND STAFF THEMSELVES UPON SUCH EVENTS IN SIMILAR WOULD BECOME ABSENT FROM THE JOB. MR. PERKINS FINDS WORK A WAY TO DEAL WITH THIS AND PERSONS WHO ARE NOT COMPASSIONATE & HEARTLESS HAVE DECIDED TO BRING MORE MENTAL ANGUISH ON HIM, THIS IS SAD BEING THIS SOME MENTAL REHAB. CENTER OR PERHAPS TREATING MR. PERKINS DURING THIS TIME WOULD PROVOKE HIM TO ACT OUT IN A MANNER THAT WOULD JUSTIFY AN INCREASE IN MEDICATION, STRAPPED TO A BED SENT BACK TO A WARD, ONE SHOULD APPLAUD MR. PERKINS IN THAT HE IS CALM USING THIS GRIEVANCE AS PROPER REMEDY. MR. PERKINS DO NOT WANT TO BE SUSPENDED FROM HIS JOB AS THIS ACTIVITY IS THERA- PUTIC IN HIS DEALING WITH PERSONAL TRAGEDY & LOSS, AGAIN THERE SEEMS TO BE NO COMPASSION & A HEARTLESS ATTITUDE ON THE PART OF C. W. P.  WE WOULD HOPE THAT IMMEDIATE ATTENTION COULD BE BROUGHT TO THIS ISSUE , MR. PERKINS ALLOWED TO WORK.                                                                                                             
This is where you enter the text that you want to appear on your page. Simply press the Edit button below to delete this text and enter your own. You can format the text using several different fonts and attributes.